February 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
           

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  

Editor Login


Convener in chief:


David Lazer
(Methodology, Networked Governance)

Editors:


Stanley Wasserman
(Current Trends, Methodology, Social Networks)

David Gibson
(Social Networks, Interaction, Theory)

Yu-Ru Lin
(Networks, Visualization)

Ines Mergel
(Knowledge Sharing, Social Computing, Social Software, Government 20)

Maria Binz-Scharf
(Qualitative Methodology, Knowledge Sharing, eGovernment)

Alexander Schellong
(Admin, eGovernment, Government 20, Citizen Relationship Management)

Categories

Archives

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

Notification

Powered by
Movable Type 4.24-en




View Blog Stats

Blog Directory & Search engine
Academics Blog Top Sites

globe_blogs.gif
Blog Flux Local - Massachusetts
Blog Flux Directory

« Call for Papers: Conference at Harvard on Networks in Political Science, June 13-14 | Main | Cary Coglianese: Weak Democracy, Strong Information: The Role of Information Technology in the Rulemaking Process »

3 January 2008

More on Iowa networks...

Let me make a few observations about the results tonight, based in part on the CNN entrance polls. First, the evangelical network beat the machine on the Republican side, with evangelical turnout making up about 60% of Republican voters, with Huckabee winning evangelicals decisively, and Romney winning non-evangelicals. Second, on the Democratic side (especially), turnout was the story, with a close to doubling of turnout from 2004. Particularly remarkable was the strong turnout of young voters—22% of those who turned out on the Democratic side were 17-29 (compare to 11% in Republican caucuses)—the same percentage as those 65 and over. Clinton decisively won those 45 and over (who still made up 60% of voters), but Obama just overwhelmed Clinton among those 45 and under.

In any case, the point here I make (casually) is that the individual decisions how to vote and whether to vote are not independent observations—that there is a pre-existing social organization (evangelicals in church, students in college)—which serves as the vessel for political action. I don’t claim this as a novel observation about politics, just one that is highlighted in these numbers.

Posted by David Lazer at January 3, 2008 11:53 PM