May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3

4

5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20

21

22

23 24 25 26
27 28

29

30 31    

Editor Login


Convener in chief:


David Lazer
(Methodology, Networked Governance)

Editors:


Stanley Wasserman
(Current Trends, Methodology, Social Networks)

Guy Stuart
(Economic Sociology, Finance)

David Gibson
(Social Networks, Interaction, Theory)

Jason Greenberg>
(Networks, Econmic Sociology, Entrepreneurship)

Allan Friedman
(Simulations)

Yu-Ru Lin
(Networks, Visualization)

Sklyer Place
(Networks, Decisionmaking)

Sune Lehmann
(Complex Networks, Computational Social Science, Statistics)

Jukka-Pekka Onnela
(Methodology, Social Networks, Technology)

Nathan Eagle
(Technology, Social Computing, Powerlaws, Current Trends)

Ben Waber
(Technology, Social Computing)
Ines Mergel
(Knowledge Sharing, Social Computing, Social Software, Government 20)

Maria Binz-Scharf
(Qualitative Methodology, Knowledge Sharing, eGovernment)

Sebastian Schorf
(Social Interaction, Cultural Interaction)

Alexander Schellong
(Admin, eGovernment, Government 20, Citizen Relationship Management)

Categories

Archives

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

Notification

Powered by
Movable Type 4.24-en




View Blog Stats

Blog Directory & Search engine
Academics Blog Top Sites

globe_blogs.gif
Blog Flux Local - Massachusetts
Blog Flux Directory

« Highlights from the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media | Main | Half of the adults in the US use network platforms to interact with friends »

24 August 2011

TweetQuake

Note: This is a joint post with Alan Mislove, based on our work with Yong-Yeol Ahn and Chloe Kliman-Silver.

On on August 23, 2011, at 1:51 PM EDT a magnitude 5.8 earthquake hit the Piedmont region of the U.S. state of Virginia. Orders of magnitude smaller than the recent earthquake in Japan, this quake was nonetheless the largest in the U.S. east of the Rocky Mountains in 114 years (according to Wikipedia).

But why are we talking about earthquakes? We should be talking about people talking about earthquakes. And people really did some talking. The official twitter account (@twitter) posted three back-to-back tweets on the subject:


Are Tweets faster than seismic waves? We can't speak to speed of seismic waves, but a Tweet can reach your followers in less than a second. [link]

Within a minute of today's #earthquake, there were more than 40,000 earthquake-related Tweets. [link]

And, we hit about 5,500 Tweets per second (TPS). For context, this TPS is more than Osama Bin Laden's death & on par w/ the Japanese quake. [link]


Now, as I am sure many people have already pointed out (e.g. on twitter), this situation was deftly analyzed and anticipated by Randall Munroe, author of the wonderful webcomic xkcd back in April 2010. Here's the strip:

seismic_waves.png

As Munroe points out, the speed of "damaging" seismic waves is around 3-5 km/second, which is much slower than the speed of information spreading on the internet. This simple fact means that if you're more than 100 km away from the epicenter you can read about the quake on twitter before it hits you.

Now, combine idea from the xkcd strip with data from the tweetquake and it's possible to observe this phenomenon in practice. In the visualization below, we've generated a video of the mentions of the work "earthquake" in tweets from the gardenhose in the 5 minutes immediately following the earthquake. For simplicity, we have assumed a uniform 4 km/s wave and ignored deformations due to map projections, etc (we're not geologists, after all).

The comic strip doesn't factor in the time it takes to actually write a tweet, and since seconds count, it takes more than 100 km before we see tweets posted outside the wavefront (validating the last frame of the comic strip). It is awe inspiring to see a truly real time news medium in action.


Notes:
PS The video looks a lot better in high definition on YouTube.
PPS Follow @suneman on twitter: http://twitter.com/suneman/

Posted by Sune Lehmann at August 24, 2011 3:50 PM