#  NYT article on measuring racial bias 

 





November 18, 2008

 

 

In today's paper, the NYT reports on an interesting debate between two groups of researchers regarding studies on unconscious racial bias (``[In Bias Test, Shades of Gray](http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/science/18tier.html)''). The discussion centers around the usefulness of an online test, the Implicit Association Test, which measures how quickly respondents associate ``good'' or ``bad'' words with blacks or whites. How useful are such tests? It does seem crude as metric for racial bias (try it yourself [here](https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/)). But I suspect that they have raised awareness and deserve credit for involving a wide audience. Yet despite its timid recommendations and disclaimers when the results are displayed the test could also be misleading: what if you're characterized as racially bias (but are not)? What if you're characterized as unbiased (but are and should be told)?

Posted by [Sebastian Bauhoff](http://www.iq.harvard.edu/blog/sss/archives/author/sebastian-bauhoff/) at November 18, 2008 12:03 AM



 

 

 



 

 

 Share on:- [     Facebook ](#)
- [     Twitter ](#)
- [     Linkedin ](#)